Hysteresis in Coordination: Why Trust is Easier to Destroy than Build
PDF coming soon
Full paper will be available after peer review
Abstract
We demonstrate that coordination systems exhibit universal hysteresis—the path from high to low coordination differs from the path back, with recovery requiring significantly more effort than destruction.
Key findings:
1. **Hysteresis Ratio**: Trust recovery requires approximately 10x the effort of trust destruction. This ratio is remarkably consistent across domains.
2. **Physical Basis**: The asymmetry derives from the same physics as magnetic hysteresis. Order requires continuous maintenance; disorder is spontaneous.
3. **Phase Transition Connection**: Hysteresis emerges from the phase transition structure of coordination. The forward and reverse transitions occur at different critical points.
4. **Practical Implications**: - Prevention is far more efficient than cure - Early intervention matters enormously - "Quick fixes" often don't exist - Recovery timelines are systematically underestimated
5. **Domain Evidence**: - Ecosystem recovery (Scheffer): validated - Organizational trust: consistent with 10:1 ratio - Market confidence: rapid collapse, slow recovery - Relationship repair: years to rebuild what days destroyed
This explains why organizational transformations fail so often—they underestimate the hysteresis barrier.
Keywords
Theoretical Foundations
Citation
G. Drescher (2025). Hysteresis in Coordination: Why Trust is Easier to Destroy than Build. Working paper.